We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 14 March 18
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - VASILIS MOIRIS
Interest in second hand tonnage remains firm with buyers in the dry bulk sector looking to benefit from rising freight rates that are eventually ex ...
Monday, 12 March 18
DRY BULK MARKET: CAPESIZE MARKET FINDS ITS FOOTING - BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
Some relief for owners as the week closed out with the market finding a floor in the East. Rates on the key West Australia/China run loo ...
Monday, 12 March 18
COAL OUTPUT FROM PRIVATE MINERS UNLIKELY TO RISE IN MEDIUM TERM: ICRA
Coal output levels from private commercial miners are unlikely to go up considerably in the medium to short term, given the issues related to land ...
Saturday, 10 March 18
ENHANCED PRODUCTION BY COAL INDIA HELPS DECLINE IN COAL IMPORTS
As per the current import policy, coal is kept under Open General License (OGL) and consumers are free to import coal from the source of their choi ...
Saturday, 10 March 18
THE 'RENOS' - COURT OF APPEAL CLARIFIES CTL CALCULATION AND RIGHT OF ABANDONMENT - CLYDE & CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In the matter of the “RENOS”, Mr Justice Knowles addressed a number of issues, at first instance, regarding t ...
|
|
|
Showing 1776 to 1780 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- VISA Power Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Parliament of New Zealand
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- PTC India Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Australian Coal Association
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- The University of Queensland
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
|
| |
| |
|
