We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 20 March 18
SHIPPING MARKET ANALYSIS - GEORGE LAZARIDIS
It has been a chilling start to the week for the global economy, with the vast majority of stock exchanges noting a fair drop, after a series of se ...
Tuesday, 20 March 18
TRAFIGURA GROUP PTE LTD SIGNS RECORD US$5.725 BILLION EUROPEAN MULTICURRENCY SYNDICATED REVOLVING CREDIT FACILITIES AND JPY72.64 BILLION DENOMINATED THREE YEAR TERM LOAN
Press Release: Trafigura Group Pte Ltd. (“Trafigura” or the “Company”), a market leader in the global commodities industry, ...
Monday, 19 March 18
PANAMAX: DESPITE FEWER REPORTED PERIOD TRADES THIS WEEK, RATE LEVELS HAVE REMAINED SOLID - BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
There were finally reports of increased Brazil activity, but still largely unconfirmed. Vale reportedly took six ships Thursday for 5 Ap ...
Friday, 16 March 18
WEEKLY US COAL PRODUCTION DROPS 1.9 PER CENT WEEK OVER WEEK - EIA
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totaled an estimated 14.8 million short tons ...
Friday, 16 March 18
INDONESIA COAL PRICE CAP POSES LIMITED RISKS TO PRODUCERS : FITCH
Indonesia’s cap on the benchmark price of coal sold to the domestic electricity sector is unlikely to have a significant impact on the credit ...
|
|
|
Showing 1766 to 1770 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- MS Steel International - UAE
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Australian Coal Association
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Parliament of New Zealand
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- White Energy Company Limited
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
|
| |
| |
|
