We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 13 June 18
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - SOPHIE COTZIAS
2018 marks quite a few milestones for Greek Shipping. No need to detail again the greatness of Greek Shipping or the singular position that Greek s ...
Monday, 11 June 18
AUSTRALIAN COAL PRICES HIT 6-YEAR HIGH AS ASIA DEMAND SPIKES - REUTERS
Australian thermal coal prices have risen to their highest level since 2012 as hot weather across North Asia spurs buying ahead of the peak summer ...
Monday, 11 June 18
ANALYSING A NEW AGE OF AUTONOMOUS VESSELS - IMO
The International Maritime Organization answers the questions of Government Europa on how the next generation of autonomous vessels can be regulate ...
Friday, 08 June 18
AUSTRALIAN THERMAL COAL PRICES SURGE AS ASIA DEMAND HEATS UP - REUTERS
Australian thermal coal prices have hit their highest level since late 2016 as the market heats up on strong demand across North Asia and China in ...
Wednesday, 06 June 18
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - KATERINA RESTIS
As observed last month the price of oil hit its highest level since November 2014 reaching $80 per barrel. Global oil demand growth for 2018 was sl ...
|
|
|
Showing 1701 to 1705 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- The University of Queensland
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- White Energy Company Limited
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- PTC India Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Parliament of New Zealand
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
|
| |
| |
|
