We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 21 June 18
ROBUST ASIAN THERMAL COAL DEMAND CREATES OPPORTUNITIES FOR AUSTRALIA - MINERALS COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIA
Minerals Council of Australia reported, Australia’s world-class coal mining industry can create more jobs in Australia and strengthen t ...
Thursday, 21 June 18
CHINESE REDUCED COAL IMPORT RESTRICTIONS - CAIXIN GLOBAL
Caixin Global reported that the Chinese government has reduced restrictions on coal imports at the nation’s major ports in response to concer ...
Thursday, 21 June 18
INDIAN GOVERNMENT ADMITS COAL SHORTAGE, ASKS DISCOMS TO IMPORT - TIMES OF INDIA
Times of India reported that the power ministry has advised all state governments and private power distribution companies to import coal as Coal I ...
Tuesday, 19 June 18
WCA RESPONDS TO BP STATISTICAL REVIEW OF WORLD ENERGY 2018
Responding to BP’s Statistical Review of World Energy 2018, Benjamin Sporton, Chief Executive of the World Coal Association (WCA) said, &ldqu ...
Wednesday, 13 June 18
U.S. COAL PRODUCTION TO DECLINE BY 2% TO 756 MILLION SHORT TONS MMST IN 2018 - EIA
EIA forecasts U.S. coal production to decline by 2% to 756 million short tons (MMst) in 2018.
According to EIA's Short-Term Ener ...
|
|
|
Showing 1696 to 1700 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- The University of Queensland
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
|
| |
| |
|
