We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 26 June 18
"ALWAYS ACCESSIBLE": ARRIVAL, DEPARTURE OR BOTH? - INCE & CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
An “always accessible” berth warranty is often used by an owner to transfer the risk of delays in berthing to ...
Tuesday, 26 June 18
A SHARP RISE IN THE PRICE OF CRUDE OIL WAS TO BE SEEN ON FRIDAY, ITS BIGGEST DAILY GAIN IN TWO YEARS - GEORGE LAZARIDIS
A sharp rise in the price of crude oil was to be seen on Friday, its biggest daily gain in two years, as OPEC reached a deal to raise output. Despi ...
Monday, 25 June 18
AUSTRALIA'S NEWCASTLE PORT SHIPPED 12.179 MT OF COAL IN MAY; DOWN 14.77% M/M
COALspot.com: The Port of Newcastle, Australia’s major trading ports and the world’s largest coal export port has shipped $AU1,453.6 Mi ...
Monday, 25 June 18
COAL IN THE CROSSFIRE: CHINESE TRADERS WARY OF BEING BURNT BY TRADE WAR - REUTERS
At least three U.S. coal shipments on their way to China may end up casualties of the escalating trade dispute after Beijing said it would impose s ...
Saturday, 23 June 18
COAL GROUP TARGETS 9 PER CENT REVENUE SPIKE - VIET NAM NEWS
Viet Nam News reported, the Viet Nam National Coal and Mineral Industries Group (Vinacomin or TKV) is targeting VNĐ116.9 trillion (US$5.1 billion) ...
|
|
|
Showing 1691 to 1695 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Australian Coal Association
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Minerals Council of Australia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- PTC India Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Planning Commission, India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
|
| |
| |
|
