We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 25 July 18
TANKER MARKET INSIGHT - DIMITRIS KOURTESIS
We are now into the second half of 2018, which so far has not been a fruitful year for tankers. With 2020 quickly approaching we need to consider t ...
Tuesday, 24 July 18
TANKER MARKET : IN TERMS OF TRADE, THE STEPS THAT WERE SLOWLY BEING TAKEN BY OPEC AND RUSSIA - GEORGE LAZARIDIS
Despite the fact that the tanker market still seems to be in the midst of a perfect storm, there are still strong indicators that better sailing da ...
Thursday, 19 July 18
VINACOMIN PRODUCES OVER 20 MLN TONNES OF RAW COAL FROM YEAR'S START - VNA
The Vietnam National Coal and Mineral Industries Group (Vinacomin) has produced over 20 million tonnes of raw coal and 19.3 million of clean coal f ...
Wednesday, 18 July 18
INDONESIA TO AUCTION 16 MINING SITES - JP
Indonesia will soon auction 16 mining sites as no proposal submissions have been submitted by state-owned enterprises (BUMN) and regional administr ...
Wednesday, 18 July 18
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - VASILIS MOIRIS
The new regulations for Chinese flag restricting import of Tier I ships have dominated market sentiment during the past days as buyers have been tr ...
|
|
|
Showing 1666 to 1670 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- White Energy Company Limited
- Minerals Council of Australia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- PTC India Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
