We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 06 July 18
COAL PRICES HAVE REMAINED STRONG BUT ARE SET TO DECLINE - NAB
Coal spot prices have been highly volatile in recent years, with an upward trend since recent lows in April 2018, National Australia Bank says in i ...
Friday, 06 July 18
HOW FLEET SIZE, CORPORATE PROFILE AND STRATEGY ARE DECIDING FACTORS IN SELECTING AN APPROPRIATE FINANCING STRATEGY - PWC
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The challenges that shipping companies are facing when selecting an appropriate financing strategy during the current per ...
Friday, 06 July 18
INDIA: GOVT TO RELAX CURBS ON INDIAN FIRMS CHARTERING FOREIGN SHIPS - HINDU BUSINESS LINE
The Ministry of Shipping is clearly in reform mode. On the heels of the recent relaxation of the cabotage law, which allows foreign flag vessels to ...
Friday, 06 July 18
AUSTRALIAN NEWCASTLE SPOT COAL PRICES HIT $120 FOR 1ST TIME SINCE 2012 - REUTERS
Australian thermal coal prices have broken through $120 per tonne for the first time since 2012, driven up by strong consumption in Asia and spot m ...
Thursday, 05 July 18
WHAT THE FAILED GLENCORE-TOHOKU COAL TALKS MEAN FOR THE MARKET - REUTERS
Electric utilities in Japan and other Asian countries are driving blind when it comes to coal prices after the failure of Japan’s Tohoku Elec ...
|
|
|
Showing 1676 to 1680 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- PTC India Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
|
| |
| |
|
