We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 31 July 18
ENERGY MINISTRY REMAINS FIRM ON DMO POLICY FOR COAL - JP
The Energy and Mineral Resources Ministry has stressed that it will not cancel its policy on the domestic market obligation (DMO) for coal, as the ...
Saturday, 28 July 18
GOVERNMENT TO REVOKE COAL PRICE CAP POLICY - JP
The government plans to revise its domestic market obligation (DMO) on coal price next week during a high-level meeting with President Joko “ ...
Thursday, 26 July 18
A SUPRAMAX IS NOW PAID AROUND USD 21,500 FOR LOADING IN THE US GULF WITH DISCHARGE IN THE FAR EAST - FEARNLEYS
Cape
There has been a relatively strong summer period so far, and there is a strong week we have left behind us.
In the Pa ...
Thursday, 26 July 18
ASEAN COAL IMPORTS INCREASED IN 2Q' 18 COMPARED TO THE PRIOR YEAR; THIS TREND TO CONTINUE AS 56 GIGAWATTS OF NEW COAL PLANTS IN 24 COUNTRIES WORLDWIDE ARE EXPECTED TO COME ONLINE IN 2018 - PEABODY
Peabody announced its second quarter 2018 operating results, including revenues of $1.31 billion, income from continuing operations, net of income ...
Wednesday, 25 July 18
COAL MINER BUKIT ASAM'S PROFIT GROWS 50% IN FIRST HALF - JP
Coal miner Bukit Asam announced 50 percent profit growth to Rp 2.58 trillion (US$177.33 million) in the first half of 2018, on the back of a coal-p ...
|
|
|
Showing 1661 to 1665 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- White Energy Company Limited
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Australian Coal Association
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- PTC India Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
