We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 02 December 18
TRADE WAR LEADING TO HEADWINDS FOR THE FRAGILE DRY BULK RECOVERY - PETER SAND, BIMCO
The first twelve weeks of the 2018/19 marketing year, which started on 1 September 2018, have painted a dire picture for US soya bean exports which ...
Friday, 30 November 18
GOVT MULLS REQUIRING MINERS TO TURN COAL INTO GAS - THE JAKARTA POST
The government is considering requiring all coal miners to turn the raw commodity into dimethylether (DME) as a substitute for liquefied petroleum ...
Friday, 30 November 18
SUPRAMAX: N. CHINA TO INDIA OR SE ASIA SUPRAS ARE GETTING PAID AROUND US$ 6000 - FEARNLEYS
Capesize
Sharp rise in spot activity and income, admittedly from very low levels, for the big ships. West Australia/China and Brazil/Far East b ...
Thursday, 29 November 18
NEW IMSBC CODE REQUIREMENTS AIM TO CONTROL LIQUEFACTION OF COAL CARGOES - GARD
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The International Maritime Solid Bulk Cargoes (IMSBC) Code describes coal as a natural, solid, combustible material consi ...
Wednesday, 28 November 18
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - GEORGE LAIOS
Last week I had the privilege to attend the SingularityU Greece Summit, in Athens. It was a privilege because you do not often have the chance to s ...
|
|
|
Showing 1546 to 1550 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- The University of Queensland
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Australian Coal Association
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
