We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 27 November 18
PANAMAX AND SUPRAMAX INDICES WITNESSED A DECLINE OF JUST BELOW 14% IN THEIR MEAN ON A MONTH-ON-MONTH COMPARISON - ALLIED SHIPPING
A month of sharp corrections and great asymmetries for the dry bulk sector, with the overall overview of the market shipping rapidly from a state o ...
Monday, 26 November 18
SUPRAMAX: THE ASIAN MARKET STALLED THIS WEEK WITH A BUILD-UP OF TONNAGE - BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
It was a positive end to the week, with West Australia/China making significant gains and firing owners’ resolve. There was talk ...
Friday, 23 November 18
GOLDEN ENERGY'S POTENTIAL ACQUISITION OF STANMORE CREDIT POSITIVE - FITCH RATINGS
Golden Energy and Resources Limited's (GEAR, B+/Positive) potential acquisition of Stanmore Coal will help the company diversify its coal opera ...
Friday, 23 November 18
ASSOCIATION CALLS FOR REVISION OF DMO SCHEME FOR COAL - JP
The Indonesian Coal Mining Association (APBI) has called on the government to revise the domestic market obligation (DMO) scheme for coal, which re ...
Friday, 23 November 18
INDONESIA'S REVENUES FROM MINERAL AND COAL INCREASE TO US$ 2.858 BILLION - ANTARA
Indonesia`s non-tax state revenues from the mineral and coal sub-sector reached Rp 41.77 trillion (approximately US$ 2.858 Billion) as of Nov 16, 2 ...
|
|
|
Showing 1551 to 1555 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Australian Coal Association
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
|
| |
| |
|
