We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 11 December 18
SHIPPING MARKET ANALYSIS - ALLIED
A lot of discussions have been made as to the effects of the IMO 2020 regulation on OPEX levels, investment feasibility of& ...
Tuesday, 11 December 18
PORT OF NEWCASTLE SHIPPED 10.849 MMT OF COAL IN NOVEMBER DOWN 23.44 PERCENT MOM
COALspot.com: The Port of Newcastle, Australia’s major trading port and the world’s largest coal export port has shipped A$ 1,574.8 mil ...
Thursday, 06 December 18
IN THE EAST, BIGGER SUPRA WAS FIXED CA US$ 10K FOR INDO-CHINA COAL ROUND - FEARNLEYS
Capesize
There is cautious optimism for the Capes, with healthier volumes and improving rates in the Pacific. West Australia round is gradually ...
Thursday, 06 December 18
U.S. COAL CONSUMPTION IN 2018 EXPECTED TO BE THE LOWEST IN 39 YEARS - EIA
EIA expects total U.S. coal consumption in 2018 to fall to 691 million short tons (MMst), a 4% decline from 2017 and the lowest level since 1979. U ...
Thursday, 06 December 18
DEMAND RISKS WEIGH ON GLOBAL SHIPPING SECTOR OUTLOOK - FITCH RATINGS
The global shipping sector outlook remains negative reflecting the demand-side risks of protectionism and slower economic growth, Fitch Ratings say ...
|
|
|
Showing 1536 to 1540 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- White Energy Company Limited
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Australian Coal Association
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
