We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 17 April 19
ONCE AGAIN WE FACED WITH THE SITUATION OF THE DRY BALTIC INDEX BEING BELOW 1,000 POINTS - INTERMODAL
Once again we are faced with the situation of the Dry Baltic Index being below 1,000 points. In a market where the feeling of insecurity is almost ...
Wednesday, 17 April 19
LNG WESTERN AFRICA CONFERENCE 2019
The only LNG Focus Platform to Accelerate Investment and Cooperation in Western African Countries
LNG Western Africa Conference 2019 ...
Saturday, 13 April 19
IMO 2020 - DON'T SCRUB IT! - IVAR MYKLEBUST
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Höegh Autoliners stands firm on its decision not to implement scrubbers but comply with the IMO 2020 regulations by ...
Saturday, 13 April 19
CAPESIZE: WEST AUSTRALIA TO CHINA IRON ORE CARGOES LIFTING FROM $4.60 PMT TO ABOVE $5.00 - BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
The market saw a steep ascent from the depths of last week. The Baltic Capesize Index (BCI) 5TC opened on Monday at $5,099, although b ...
Friday, 12 April 19
OIL MARKET REPORT: MIXED SIGNALS - IEA
The huge increase in oil production we saw in 2H18 has reversed following the implementation of the new Vienna Agreement and the increasing effecti ...
|
|
|
Showing 1416 to 1420 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- PTC India Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- The University of Queensland
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
|
| |
| |
|
