We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 09 May 19
OFFSHORE CARIBBEAN CONGRESS 2019
Offshore Caribbean Congress 2019
Event Date: 4-5th July. 2019t
Location: Georgetown, Guyana
Hess announced a new d ...
Tuesday, 07 May 19
UNDOUBTEDLY A VERY TROUBLED YEAR FOR THE DRY BULK MARKET, SAYS ALLIED SHIPPING
Undoubtedly a very troubled year for the dry bulk market says Allied Shipping in its latest weekly report.
Thomas Chasapis, Re ...
Saturday, 04 May 19
HOW THE 'FAIR VALUE' OF COAL ASSETS IS AFFECTED BY COMMODITY CYCLES - CRU
As with any commodity, valuing coal assets can be tricky due to the cyclical nature of the market. In this insight, CRU discusses how commodity cyc ...
Friday, 03 May 19
SUPRAMAX: WITH WIDESPREAD HOLIDAYS DURING THE WEEK, THE MARKET LACKED IMPETUS - BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
The market last week was a tale of two halves, with substantial volatility. Beginning the week on a positive note the C5 West Australi ...
Friday, 03 May 19
COAL INDIA APRIL OUTPUT RISES 1% TO 45.29 MILLION TONNE - PTI
Coal India Ltd (CIL) Wednesday said its coal production in April 2019 rose by 1 per cent to 45.29 million tonne as compared with 44.86 million tonn ...
|
|
|
Showing 1406 to 1410 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- The University of Queensland
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- White Energy Company Limited
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- GMR Energy Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
