We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 28 April 19
SUPRAMAX: A 54,000DWT VESSEL OPEN GRESIK FIXED VIA AUSTRALIA, REDELIVERY CHINA, IN THE MID $12,000S - BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
Following the holidays, activity increased in both the Pacific and Atlantic Basins. The 5TC average rallied, closing at $8,596, up $1, ...
Wednesday, 24 April 19
PANAMAX: IN THE EAST, THE MARKET MOVED SIDE-WAYS, WITH FEWER COAL CARGOES FROM INDONESIA PUTTING PRESSURE ON RATES - INTERMODAL
Sentiment in the Dry Bulk market slowly but steadily kept improving last week as Capesize rates remained in recovery mode and Panamax earnings also ...
Wednesday, 24 April 19
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - IS THIS A BANKERS' MARKET? - INTERMODAL
Over the last 10 years, many of the traditional and top lending banks have made the decision to either downsize their portfolios or even exit shipp ...
Monday, 22 April 19
COAL INDIA TO ASK POWER PLANTS TO CUT COAL IMPORTS - DNA
Co to encourage import substitution with domestic supplies at power plants
Surge in coal imports has now forced Coal India Ltd (CIL) ...
Thursday, 18 April 19
BIMCO SEES HARD TIMES AHEAD FOR CAPESIZES
China’s increased use of scrap metal for its production of crude steel is fundamentally critical to the dry bulk shipping industry. Mostly Ca ...
|
|
|
Showing 1411 to 1415 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- PTC India Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Australian Coal Association
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Parliament of New Zealand
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- The University of Queensland
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
|
| |
| |
|
