We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 21 October 19
SHIPPERS CHANGE COURSE AS FUEL RULES TARGET SULPHUR EMISSIONS - WOOD MACKENZIE
The International Maritime Organization (IMO), the industry’s regulator, will require all ships to reduce the level of sulphur in their engin ...
Monday, 21 October 19
COAL TO PLAY SIGNIFICANT ROLE IN SOUTH AFRICA POWER MIX - MINISTER, REUTERS REPORTED
South Africa’s plans for additional power generation over the next decade will involve a variety of energy sources, with coal still playing a ...
Monday, 21 October 19
ULTRAMAX: IN ASIA, TRIPS FROM THE SINGAPORE AREA WERE PAYING BETWEEN $14,000 AND $16,000, DEPENDING ON THE VESSEL SIZE AND DURATION - BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
The market traded in a relatively stable supported manner in the Pacific this week while the Atlantic experienced weakening turbulence ...
Friday, 18 October 19
WHY CRUDE TANKER RATES JUST FELL (HALFWAY) BACK TO EARTH - FREIGHT WAVES
Panic drove crude-tanker rates up, very briefly, to mind-bogglingly high assessed levels of around $300,000 per day. Now, the fear factor has been ...
Friday, 18 October 19
SHORT TERM STRENGTH FOR OZ COMMODITIES - BALTIC BRIEFING
Volatility in the global commodity markets is not expected to unduly rattle Australia’s commodity outlook through 2020, but the 2021 picture ...
|
|
|
Showing 1306 to 1310 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Australian Coal Association
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- The University of Queensland
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
|
| |
| |
|
