We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 18 October 19
SINGAPORE'S APEX TO LAUNCH LOW-SULFUR FUEL OIL CONTRACT AHEAD OF NEW SHIPPING RULES - REUTERS
Singapore-based Asia Pacific Exchange (APEX) will launch a low-sulfur fuel oil (LSFO) futures contract on Friday aimed at helping shipping and ener ...
Thursday, 17 October 19
INDIA READIES POLICY TO ATTRACT FOREIGN INVESTMENT IN COAL MINING - REUTERS
India expects to have formulated a policy within the next two weeks to attract foreign investment to its coal mining industry, the country’s ...
Wednesday, 16 October 19
INDIA CALLS FOR A RESET OF CLIMATE DEBATE ON COAL AS A FUEL - LIVEMINT
India on Tuesday called for a reset on climate debate on coal as a fuel, in the backdrop of India becoming one of the top renewable energy producer ...
Wednesday, 16 October 19
LESSONS LEARNT FROM CREW INJURED IN HEAVY WEATHER - UK P&I CLUB COMMENTS
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Stuart Edmonston, Loss Prevention at UK P&I Club, discusses an incident in which crew were injured whilst on deck in ...
Wednesday, 16 October 19
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
In perhaps the most interesting market conditions of the past years, the tanker and the dry bulk industry have created a positive sentiment with re ...
|
|
|
Showing 1311 to 1315 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- PTC India Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Planning Commission, India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Australian Coal Association
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
