We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 04 November 19
COAL INDIA'S OCTOBER PRODUCTION MAY FALL 20% - PTI
Coal India’s production in October is likely to be 19-20 per cent lower at about 40 million tonne, as compared to 49.77 million tonne produce ...
Monday, 04 November 19
PANAMAX: WEAKER SENTIMENTS CONTINUED FROM LAST WEEK, WITH RATES FURTHER SOFTENING IN BOTH BASINS - BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
The Capesize market meandered slightly upwards this week before giving back much of its gains mid-week. Opening the week at $24,945, t ...
Thursday, 31 October 19
U.S. COAL-FIRED POWER PLANTS SCHEDULED TO SHUT - REUTERS
U.S. power companies expect to retire or convert from coal to gas over 13,800 megawatts (MW) of coal-fired plants in 2019 after shutting over 13,30 ...
Thursday, 31 October 19
SE ASIA MAY BECOME NET FOSSIL FUEL IMPORTER IN COMING YEARS - IEA
Southeast Asia is set to become a key driver of world energy trends over the next 20 years as its energy demand grows at twice the global average, ...
Monday, 28 October 19
ULTRAMAX: ASIA RATES REMAINED UNDER PRESSURE WITH THE NORTH LACKING FRESH ENQUIRY - BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
The end of the week brought about a small increase in sentiment heading into a long weekend for some regions. After sustaining a drop ...
|
|
|
Showing 1296 to 1300 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- The University of Queensland
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Planning Commission, India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
