We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 18 November 19
SUPRAMAX: IN THE INDONESIAN COAL BUSINESS, A 58KDWT VESSEL FIXED DELIVERY PHILIPPINES, REDELIVERY INDIA AT CLOSE TO $8,000 - BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
For most of the week the rates were nudging up under a flurry of activity in the Pacific as levels for the West Australia to China C5 ...
Saturday, 16 November 19
LIFE AFTER FOSSIL FUELS: THE DAYS OF OIL AND COAL TRANSPORTATION ARE NUMBERED - BALTIC EXCHANGE
With the world fiercely focused on a decarbonised future, fossil fuel movers and traders might rightly be reconsidering their future. But cast a wi ...
Saturday, 16 November 19
OIL MARKET REPORT: PAUSING TO REFLECT - IEA
Global oil demand in 3Q19 increased by 1.1 mb/d year-on-year (y-o-y), more than double the 435 kb/d seen in 2Q19. China’s demand increased by ...
Friday, 15 November 19
RISING ENERGY DEMAND IN SOUTHEAST ASIA TO BE MET AND SUPPORTED BY COAL - WORLD COAL
Last week the International Energy Agency (IEA) released its semi-annual Southeast Asia Energy Outlook report which outlines the latest insights in ...
Thursday, 14 November 19
EIA EXPECTS U.S. STEAM COAL EXPORTS TO FACE INCREASING COMPETITION FROM EASTERN EUROPEAN SOURCES
EIA expects total U.S. coal production in 2019 to total 698 million short tons (MMst), an 8% decrease from the 2018 level of 756 MMst. The decline ...
|
|
|
Showing 1286 to 1290 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- The University of Queensland
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- PTC India Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Planning Commission, India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
