We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 20 November 19
FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENTS IN COMMERCIAL COAL MINING IN INDIA? - DIPESH DIPU
In August 2019, Government of India announced its approval for Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) for coal mining, processing and sale. Not that FDI i ...
Wednesday, 20 November 19
AUSTRALIA'S NEW HOPE POSTS 66% SURGE IN Q1 SALEABLE COAL OUTPUT - REUTERS
Australian coal producer New Hope Corp Ltd reported on Tuesday a 66% jump in saleable coal production in the first quarter, as output ramped up at ...
Wednesday, 20 November 19
THE IMO AND THE PRICE OF GAS OR THE IMPACT OF THE INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANISATION'S SULPHUR 2020 LIMIT FOR MARINE FUEL OIL ON THE PRICE OF GAS - KING & SPALDING
The main bunker fuel for ships is High Sulphur Fuel Oil (HSFO, with sulphur up to 3.5% m/m (mass by mass)). This will all change on 1 January 2020 ...
Wednesday, 20 November 19
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
While the market expects the next OPEC meeting, there are still no clear signs indicating that the organization will keep supporting oil prices, wh ...
Monday, 18 November 19
CHINA RECORDS STABLE COAL PRODUCTION IN JAN-OCT: XINHUA
China’s raw coal output registered stable growth in the first 10 months, while its imports remained robust, official data showed.
...
|
|
|
Showing 1281 to 1285 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Planning Commission, India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Australian Coal Association
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- White Energy Company Limited
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
