We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 26 November 19
PREPARATIONS INTENSIFY AS 1 JANUARY 2020 GLOBAL CUT IN SULPHUR IN SHIP'S FUEL OIL LOOMS: IMO
“IMO 2020” requirements for ships to cut sulphur oxide emissions enter into effect in just over one month’s time. This will signi ...
Monday, 25 November 19
COAL SUPPLY BY CIL TO POWER SECTOR DROPS OVER 8 PC TO 253 MT IN APRIL-OCTOBER - PTI
Supply of coal by state-owned CIL to the power sector registered a decline of 8.5 per cent to 253 million tonnes in the April-October period of thi ...
Monday, 25 November 19
A 53,000DWT SHIP FIXED AT $9,500 DELIVERY SINGAPORE TRIP, VIA INDONESIA, REDELIVERY VIETNAM - BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
After a week of value being eroded on the Capesize market, Friday brought improved sentiment across most of the routes. The 5TC averag ...
Monday, 25 November 19
KOWEPO INVITED 6.79 MILLION TONS OF (SUB)BITUMINOUS STEAM COAL BIDS
COALspot.com: South Korea’s Korea Western Power Co., Ltd. (KOWEPO) has issued an international tender for 6,798,000 tons of coal for 5 years ...
Friday, 22 November 19
CHINA'S BENCHMARK POWER COAL PRICE REMAINS FLAT - XINHUA
China’s benchmark power coal price remained flat during the past week.
The Bohai-Rim Steam-Coal Price Index (BSPI), a gauge of ...
|
|
|
Showing 1271 to 1275 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- PTC India Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- The University of Queensland
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Australian Coal Association
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- White Energy Company Limited
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Planning Commission, India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
