We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 18 February 20
ADARO REMAINS POSITIVE ON THE LONG-TERM FUNDAMENTALS OF COAL MARKET SUPPORTED BY THE SOUTHEAST ASIA AND SOUTH ASIA REGION
The global seaborne thermal coal market in 2019 was faced with macro and industry challenges which pushed international coa ...
Tuesday, 18 February 20
CORONAVIRUS AND ITS IMPACT ON YOUR CONTRACT - CAN YOU RELY ON 'FORCE MAJEURE'? - INCE
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
On 30 January 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared that the outbreak of the Novel Coronavirus (officially t ...
Monday, 17 February 20
IMO-2020 SULPHUR CAP - ISSUES TO CONSIDER PRIOR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CARRIAGE BAN ON 1 MARCH 2020 - STANDARD CLUB
With the IMO 2020 global sulphur cap now in force, members should bear in mind another significant date in relation to the ‘carriage ban&rsqu ...
Monday, 17 February 20
COVID-19: THE EFFECT OF THIS PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY ON CHARTERPARTY TERMS - GARD
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Is it useful to compare the COVID-19 with earlier disease outbreaks?
A comparison with the Ebola outbreak ...
Saturday, 15 February 20
CHINA'S BENCHMARK POWER COAL PRICE EDGES UP - REUTERS
China’s benchmark power coal price rose slightly during the past week.
The Bohai-Rim Steam-Coal Price Index (BSPI), a gauge of ...
|
|
|
Showing 1126 to 1130 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- White Energy Company Limited
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- PTC India Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
