We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 11 March 20
CHINA TAIYUAN COAL TRANSACTION PRICE INDEX UP 0.07 PCT - XINHUA
China Taiyuan coal transaction price index stood at 133.16 points Monday, up 0.07 percent week on week.
The index, released by China ...
Wednesday, 11 March 20
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
On the 4th of September the Baltic Dry Index marked its highest level for 2019, reaching 2,518 points, while the rest of the dry indices also recor ...
Tuesday, 10 March 20
SHIPPING MARKET ANALYSIS
It might be already overstated, but it seems to be important to point out once again how peculiar the current circumstances are.
Before the st ...
Tuesday, 10 March 20
EIA FORECASTS U.S ELECTRIC POWER SECTOR DEMAND FOR COAL WILL FALL BY 81 MMST (15%) IN 2020
EIA forecasts that U.S. coal production will total 595 million short tons (MMst) in 2020, down 95 MMst (14%) from 2019. According to EIA's Shor ...
Tuesday, 10 March 20
CORONAVIRUS: DEMAND DOWNGRADES FOR BULK COMMODITIES - WOOD MACKENZIE
The coronavirus outbreak is a rapidly evolving news story – and a real wildcard for bulks demand. Our global experts are monitoring the impac ...
|
|
|
Showing 1076 to 1080 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- The University of Queensland
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- MS Steel International - UAE
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Parliament of New Zealand
|
| |
| |
|
