We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 24 March 20
THE TRIPLE SHOCK OF CORONAVIRUS IN SHIPPING: WILL IT LAST? - DREWRY
Transport capacity shortages, disruptions to supply chains and inability to plan since late January have been a dangerous combination. But will all ...
Tuesday, 24 March 20
CHINA TAIYUAN COAL TRANSACTION PRICE INDEX DOWN 0.28 PCT - XINHUA
China Taiyuan coal transaction price index stood at 132.74 points Monday, down 0.28 percent week on week.
The index, released by Chi ...
Monday, 23 March 20
CHARTERPARTY REQUIREMENTS TO NOTIFY CLAIMS - TAKE CARE! - WFW
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Voyage charterparties frequently require the owner to notify any claim with supporting documents within a relatively shor ...
Monday, 23 March 20
COAL INDIA LIMITED'S ONE-DAY OUTPUT PEAKS AT 3.17 MT - THE HINDU
Coal India Limited (CIL) output peaked at a new high of 3.17 million tonnes (MT) on March 20, overtaking the 3.14 MT production recorded on March 2 ...
Monday, 23 March 20
KOMIPO INVITED BIDS FOR 1.45 MILLION TONS OF COAL FOR JUNE & JULY 2020 LOADING
COALspot.com: Korea Midland Power Co.,Ltd (KOMIPO), on behalf of five Korean Gencos, has issued an international tender for total 1,450,000 MT (&pl ...
|
|
|
Showing 1051 to 1055 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Australian Coal Association
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Planning Commission, India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- VISA Power Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- The University of Queensland
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
