We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 25 March 20
CORONAVIRUS CRISIS IS CRUSHING GLOBAL GDP GROWTH - FITCH RATINGS
The coronavirus crisis is crushing global GDP growth according to Fitch Ratings in its latest quarterly “Global Economic Outlook” (GEO) ...
Wednesday, 25 March 20
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
There is no doubt that the Covid-19 pandemic crisis is a world-shattering event that will change the world as we know it. Societies are facing chal ...
Wednesday, 25 March 20
INDONESIA TO CANCEL RULES REQUIRING DOMESTIC SHIPS FOR COAL, PALM EXPORTS : REFINITIV
Indonesia's government will revoke rules requiring exporters of coal and palm oil to use domestic shipping companies for shipments, Coordinatin ...
Wednesday, 25 March 20
JAN-FEB 2020, INDONESIA SHIPPED 64.5 MLN TONNES OF COAL, UP +3.4% YOY - BANCHERO COSTA
In the 12 months of calendar 2019, Indonesia exported 386.4 mln tonnes of coal, according to vessel tracking data from Refinitiv. This represents a ...
Tuesday, 24 March 20
MARKET ANALYSIS - ALLIED
As countries around the world struggle to take back control of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic the global economy shuts down bit by bit, leaving only ...
|
|
|
Showing 1046 to 1050 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Australian Coal Association
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Minerals Council of Australia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- White Energy Company Limited
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Planning Commission, India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- PTC India Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
|
| |
| |
|
