We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 19 March 20
A CRUDE TSUNAMI: UP TO 3 MILLION BPD OF EXTRA OIL CAN HIT THE MARKET FROM APRIL, MORE COMING IN MAY - RYSTAD ENERGY
The extra oil coming into the global market from April will be as much as 3 million barrels per day (bpd), Rystad Energy estimates. Two million bpd ...
Thursday, 19 March 20
BIMCO REVISES 2020 FORECAST FOR MAIN SHIPPING MARKETS
The coronavirus pandemic is impacting global shipping demand for 2020 negatively. The speed of the virus spread makes it difficult to assess the fu ...
Thursday, 19 March 20
U.S. COAL EXPORTS DECLINED IN 2019 - EIA
In 2019, U.S. coal exports declined to 93 million short tons (MMst), a 20% decrease from the previous year, according to the U.S. Energy Informatio ...
Thursday, 19 March 20
SOUTH KOREA'S KOSPO INVITED BIDS FOR MIN 3,700 OR MIN 4,200 NCV LOW CALORIFIC VALUE COAL
COALspot.com: Korea Southern Power Co., Ltd. (KOSPO), has issued an international tender for total 160,000 MT (±10%) (80,000 x 2 Panamax) of ...
Wednesday, 18 March 20
DRY BULK: INDONESIAN COAL CARGOES PROVIDING A BIG BOOST IN THE EAST WHERE SENTIMENT FOR HANDIES ALSO STARTED IMPROVING - INTERMODAL
The BDI ended last week with small gains on the back of an encouraging number of cargoes out of key trading regions that helped sustain the reserve ...
|
|
|
Showing 1061 to 1065 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- White Energy Company Limited
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
|
| |
| |
|
