We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 31 March 20
CHINA TAIYUAN COAL TRANSACTION PRICE INDEX DOWN 0.43 PCT - XINHUA
China Taiyuan coal transaction price index stood at 132.17 points Monday, down 0.43 percent week on week.
The index, released by Chi ...
Tuesday, 31 March 20
COAL POWER REMAINS IN GLOBAL DECLINE, DESPITE CHINESE SURGE - SYDNEY MORNING HERALD
The impact of coronavirus has prompted a surge in coal-fired power plant construction permits in China, with the Chinese government issuing more pe ...
Monday, 30 March 20
CORONAVIRUS - IMPLICATIONS FOR SHIPS AND CREW - GARD
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Countries around the world are strengthening their border control measures in order to prevent the further spread of COVI ...
Monday, 30 March 20
LAY-UP AND RE-ACTIVATION REVISITED - GARD
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the maritime industry in previously unthinkable ways. Ports around the world are denyi ...
Monday, 30 March 20
PANAMAX: INDONESIA LACKED VOLUME, PARTLY DUE TO FORCE MAJEURE IN INDIAN PORTS - BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
As Covid-19 continued to ratchet up tensions across the globe, the Cape market dealt with the change to remote working. Most regions o ...
|
|
|
Showing 1036 to 1040 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Planning Commission, India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Parliament of New Zealand
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Australian Coal Association
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
|
| |
| |
|
