We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 07 April 20
IS CHINA EMBARKING ON A MAJOR EXPANSION OF COAL-FIRED POWER GENERATION? - WOOD MACKENZIE
As energy companies worldwide grapple with the economic impact of the coronavirus pandemic, long-term planning continues. Ahead of the release of t ...
Tuesday, 07 April 20
COAL INDIA'S DISPATCHES DROP, OUTPUT INCREASES - THE HINDU
India’s largest coal producer Coal India Ltd. (CIL) has seen a 10% fall in dispatches in March 2020 due to a sharp fall in demand from the po ...
Tuesday, 07 April 20
CORONAVIRUS AND LOCKDOWNS DRAG DOWN THE INDONESIAN COAL PRICE REFERENCE IN APRIL
COALspot.com: The Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources of the Republic of Indonesia has revised down the benchmark price of the Indonesian ther ...
Monday, 06 April 20
A 52,000DWT SHIP FIXING DELIVERY SINGAPORE TRIP, VIA INDONESIA, REDELIVERY TAIWAN, AT $3,100 - BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
The Capesize market this past week looks to have come off life support and found some improved sentiment. The week began rather ordina ...
Monday, 06 April 20
INDIA'S 21-DAY LOCKDOWN - IMPACT ON COMMODITIES? - WOOD MACKENZIE
India is under a three-week lockdown from 25 March, to contain the spread of the coronavirus outbreak. Wood Mackenzie analysts discuss what this me ...
|
|
|
Showing 1026 to 1030 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- The University of Queensland
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
