We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 02 August 24
COAL MARKET DEVELOPMENTS: FALLING PRICES AMID RECORD-HIGH OUTPUT - WORLD BANK
Coal prices inched up in May (m/m) following an 8 percent decline in 2024Q1. The Australian and South African benchmarks have plummeted more ...
Friday, 26 July 24
FUELEU MARITME IS COMING. IS YOUR CHARTERPARTY READY? - GARD
With less than six months to implementation of FuelEU Maritime in EU and EEA trades, there has been little published advice regarding how to alloca ...
Thursday, 04 July 24
INDIA'S COAL PRODUCTION RISES 14% IN JUNE - PTI
The country’s coal production rose by 14.49% to 84.63 million tonne (MT) in June. The country’s coal output was 73.92 MT in June last f ...
Tuesday, 02 July 24
NTPC CAPTIVE COAL OUTPUT GROWS 15% IN Q1; DESPATCH RISES 17%
State-owned NTPC on Monday reported a 15 per cent year-on-year increase in the production of coal from captives mines to 9.862 metric million tonne ...
Friday, 28 June 24
KOSPO INVITED BIDS FOR 400,000 MT OF MINIMUM 4000 NCV COAL FOR FIVE YEARS
Korea Southern Power Co., Ltd. (KOSPO), is inviting bids for total 400,000 MT of Low Calorific Value Coal for 5 years starting from July 2024 until ...
|
|
|
Showing 6 to 10 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Parliament of New Zealand
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
|
| |
| |
|
