We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 06 September 24
REBOUND IN OIL DEMAND COULD LIFT MARKET IN LATTER HALF OF 2024 - BIMCO
Supply/demand
Based on a strong second half demand, the supply/balance is forecast to strengthen in 2024 but weaken slightly in 2025 as n ...
Friday, 06 September 24
GLOBAL SEABORNE LNG TRADE HAS CONTINUED TO INCREASE LAST YEAR - BANCHERO COSTA
Global seaborne LNG trade has continued to increase last year, helped also by the events in Ukraine which forced Europe to diversify away from Russ ...
Wednesday, 28 August 24
SEABORNE COAL IMPORTS INTO INDIA INCREASED BY +9.9% Y-O-Y TO 146.6 MLN T - BANCHERO COSTA
Global coal trade has really picked up pace over the past year, and is now fully back to pre-Covid levels said Banchero Costa Research in its lates ...
Tuesday, 06 August 24
EXERCISE CAUTION WITH AMMONIA SWITCH - BALTIC EXCHANGE
A new study from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) has thrown a spanner into the plan to transition ships from diesel fuel to ammonia ...
Friday, 02 August 24
ENERGY MARKET DEVELOPMENTS: COAL AND NATURAL GAS PRICES REACH RECORD HIGHS - WORLD BANK
The recent surge in natural gas and coal prices has been so swift that the main benchmarks were roughly three times higher in 2022Q2 compared to a ...
|
|
|
Showing 1 to 5 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- The University of Queensland
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- PTC India Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
|
| |
| |
|
1 