We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 29 June 20
CHINA COAL IMPORT OUTLOOK: MANY MOVING PARTS, FORECAST TO FALL 10% YOY - GHEE PEH | IEEFA
China’s coal demand declined in the first quarter of 2020. According to the China National Coal Association, the country consumed 870mt in th ...
Monday, 29 June 20
ULTRAMAX: A 58,000 FIXING DELIVERY SINGAPORE TRIP, VIA EAST COAST INDIA, REDELIVERY CHINA IN THE LOW $12,000S - BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
As the halfway mark of 2020 arrives, the capesize market is making new highs for the year. From persistent lows earlier caused by a ba ...
Saturday, 27 June 20
CHINA'S BENCHMARK POWER COAL PRICE REMAINS FLAT - XINHUA
China’s benchmark power coal price remained flat during the past week.
The Bohai-Rim Steam-Coal Price Index (BSPI), a gauge of ...
Friday, 26 June 20
WHAT TODAY'S BAILOUTS CAN DO FOR TOMORROW'S ECONOMIES - WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM
The COVID-19 crisis provides an opportunity for governments to build fairer, more sustainable and more resilient economies.
Governments a ...
Thursday, 25 June 20
ALL YOU WANT TO KNOW ABOUT COAL MINE AUCTIONS - THE HINDU BUSINESS LINE
Last week, Prime Minister Narendra Modi threw open the auction of 41 coal blocks for commercial mining. The decision, which was part of the announc ...
|
|
|
Showing 891 to 895 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- PTC India Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- White Energy Company Limited
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Economic Council, Georgia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
