We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 01 June 09
LAHAT RELIES ON COAL FOR GROWTH
Lahat regency in South Sumatra spans 6,618.27 square kilometers, encompasses 19 districts and covers 528 subdistricts and villages. It is inhabited ...
Monday, 01 June 09
LANDED COST OF IMPORTED COAL HAS INCREASED BY 10 - 15% COMPARE TO EARLY THIS YEAR - PAKISTAN TRADERS
COALspot.com (Pakistan): Due to visiting non commercial vessels occupied commercial berths in Karachi port, coal carrying vessels were sufferi ...
Monday, 01 June 09
LAHAT RELIES ON COAL FOR GROWTH - THE JAKARTA POST
Lahat regency in South Sumatra spans 6,618.27 square kilometers, encompasses 19 districts and covers 528 subdistricts and villages. It is inhabited ...
Saturday, 30 May 09
THE CHINESE IMPORTS OF IRON ORE,COAL AND NICKEL ORE SEEMED TO BE STEADY - VISTAAR SINGAPORE
COALspot.com (Singapore): VISTAAR Shipping Pte Limited, an experienced ship operator from Singapore,said, the Baltic index rally continued this week ...
Saturday, 30 May 09
COAL INDIA SIGNS FUEL SUPPLY AGREEMENT WITH NTPC - SINDHTODAY
India’s largest coal miner Coal India Friday inked a much-awaited fuel supply agreement (FSA) with power generation major NTPC Ltd.
In the ...
|
|
|
Showing 6721 to 6725 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Parliament of New Zealand
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Planning Commission, India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- PTC India Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Australian Coal Association
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
|
| |
| |
|