We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 29 May 09
INDONESIA PLANS "CLEARING HOUSE" FOR COAL - ALIBABA
Alibaba reported that, Indonesia, the world's biggest thermal coal exporter, plans to set up an agency similar to a clearing house to trade stocks ...
Friday, 29 May 09
INDIKA EYES MORE ACQUISITIONS - THE JAKARTA POST
Having nearly completed the acquisition of engineering and mining company PT Petrosea, energy company PT Indika Energy is preparing for more acquisi ...
Friday, 29 May 09
PTBA PAYS DIVIDENDS OF RP 371.5 A SHARE - THE JAKARTA POST
The annual shareholders' meeting of state-controlled coal producer PT Tambang Batubara Bukit Asam (PTBA) approved on Thursday the allocation of 50 ...
Thursday, 28 May 09
INDIANS CHOOSE SOUTH AFRICA COAL OVER INDONESIAN - MINEWEB (REUTERS)
South African cargoes are about $4 a tonne cheaper than Indonesian coal, as a result India now prefers South Africa .
Indian imports of South Afr ...
Wednesday, 27 May 09
NEWCASTLE PORT'S WEEKLY COAL EXPORTS INCREASE 3.6% - BLOOMBERG
Coal shipments from Australia’s Newcastle port, the world’s biggest export harbor for the fuel, rose 3.6 percent last week while the num ...
|
|
|
Showing 6726 to 6730 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- White Energy Company Limited
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Parliament of New Zealand
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- The University of Queensland
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Economic Council, Georgia
|
| |
| |
|
