We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 03 June 09
POWER DEMAND TO BOOST INDIA COAL IMPORTS DURING MONSOON - STEELGURU
Reuters quoted Indian coal importers said that strong demand for power in India is likely to keep coal imports at the maximum level possible in the ...
Wednesday, 03 June 09
NAPOCOR EXTENDS COAL TENDER FOR SOLE BIDDER - ABS CBNNEWS
National Power Corp. (Napocor), the top Philippine electricity producer, has given the lone bidder at a tender for 195,000 tons of coal more time to ...
Wednesday, 03 June 09
NEWCASTLE COAL EXPORTS JUMP 20 PERCENT; SHIP QUEUE LENGTHENS - BLOOMBERG
Coal exports from Australia’s Newcastle, the world’s biggest export harbor for the fuel, jumped 20 percent last week while the number of ...
Wednesday, 03 June 09
IPL-2 OVER, INDIAN COAL LEAGUE BEGINS IN SOUTH AFRICA - ECONOMICTIME
Steel, cement and power companies, which have traditionally relied on cheap Indonesian coal to fuel their factories, are rushing to buy South Africa ...
Wednesday, 03 June 09
BUILDING A ROAD TO LINK 3 GIANTS - THE JAKARTA GLOBE
Madhu Koneru is building a road to the future that will bring together the financial heft of the Middle East, the technological know-how of a rising ...
|
|
|
Showing 6711 to 6715 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- White Energy Company Limited
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Australian Coal Association
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Planning Commission, India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
