We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 04 June 09
ASIA COAL - PRICES RISE TO 31/2 MTH HIGH ON OIL, ECONOMY - INTERACTIVE INVESTOR
Interactive Investor reported that, Prices of power-station coal from Australia, a benchmark for Asia, rose to a three-and-a-half-month high of over ...
Thursday, 04 June 09
PTT: RESTRUCTURING BUSINESS, DIVERSIFYING INTO COAL - EASYBOURSE
Thailand's largest energy conglomerate, PTT PCL (PTT.TH), will diversify into coal as part of its business restructuring, Senior Executive Vice Pre ...
Thursday, 04 June 09
ADARO SECURES THREE NEW CONTRACTS, SAYS OUTLOOK POSITIVE - THE JAKARTA POST
Publicly listed PT Adaro Energy, the country's second largest coal miner, announced Wednesday it had secured three new coal contracts from buyers f ...
Wednesday, 03 June 09
XSTRATA, KOMIPO AGREE SOME '09 COAL TONNAGE AT $63/T- REUTERS
South Korean utility Korea Midland Power Co (KOMIPO) has agreed to buy part of its 2009 term contract tonnage from Xstrata's coal unit at about $63 ...
Wednesday, 03 June 09
KOSEP SEEKS UP TO 3 MLN TONNES OF COAL - REUTERS
Korea South-East Power Co Ltd (KOSEP) has issued four tenders seeking a total of 3 million tonnes of coal for delivery between 2009 to 2011, a tende ...
|
|
|
Showing 6706 to 6710 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Australian Coal Association
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Planning Commission, India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- White Energy Company Limited
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|