We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 08 June 09
PRIVATE COAL MINERS LIKELY TO LAND COMMERCIAL LICENSE - ECONOMIC TIMES
Economic Times of India reported that, The government may allow commercial coal mining by private companies as it looks to plug the demand-supply ga ...
Monday, 08 June 09
SAN MIGUEL EYES LOCAL MINING VENTURES - PHILIPPINE DAILY INQUIRER
Philippine Daily Inquirer reported that, Diversifying conglomerate San Miguel Corp.is making big plans for Philippine mining, seen as an industry th ...
Monday, 08 June 09
NAPOCOR BUYING COAL FOR PAGBILAO PLANT - PHILIPPINE DAILY INQUIRER
Philippine Daily Inquirer reported that, State-run National Power Corp. plans to buy 390,000 metric tons of steaming coal next month, to supply the ...
Sunday, 07 June 09
SEMIRARA SELLING COAL TO THAILAND - STEELGURU
Business Mirror reported that coal producer Semirara Mining Corporation has successfully entered the Thailand market during the Q1 of the year, help ...
Saturday, 06 June 09
IS THE RECESSION OVER ? - CAPT. REDDY, VISTAAR SHIPPING
COALspot.com (Singapore): Is the recession over, that is what most analysts think and seems so from the Baltic Index rally and firm commodity ...
|
|
|
Showing 6696 to 6700 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- VISA Power Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- White Energy Company Limited
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- PTC India Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
|
| |
| |
|
