We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 27 June 09
HEAVY CONGESTION AT AUSTRALIAN PORTS REACHING ALL TIME HIGH TO 120 SHIPS IN EAST COAST AUSTRALIA - VISTAAR SHIPPING
COALspot.com (Singapore): The market this week was a bit soft and the BDI was down by almost 10 pct and closed at 3,703 points.
The drop in BDI i ...
Friday, 26 June 09
INDONESIA INVESTORS EYE BHP BILLITON COAL PROJECT
About four Indonesian investors are interested in taking over a coal project owned by BHP Billiton Ltd, a senior government mining official said.
...
Friday, 26 June 09
SOUTH AFRICA'S CONSULTING GROUP OPENS OFFICES IN CHINA, INDONESIA
Consulting engineering company SRK Consulting has opened new offices in Asia to cope with the growing demand for its services in the region.
The ...
Friday, 26 June 09
RUSSIA MECHEL TO DELIVER 2 MLN T COKING COAL TO ASIA
Russian steel and coal producer Mechel said on Thursday it had signed contracts to deliver about 2 million tonnes of coking coal concentrate to unna ...
Friday, 26 June 09
SA COAL EXPORTS UNLIKELY TO BREACH 65MT THIS YEAR
Coal volumes railed to South Africa’s Richards Bay Coal Terminal (RBCT) during the rain-affected first quarter of 2009 had fallen well short o ...
|
|
|
Showing 6646 to 6650 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Planning Commission, India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- White Energy Company Limited
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Australian Coal Association
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Economic Council, Georgia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- PTC India Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|