We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 26 June 09
BAYAN TARGETS GROSS PROFIT TO RISE BY 86.2 PERCENT
Local coal producer publicly listed PT Bayan Resources is targeting this year's gross profit to rise by 86.2 percent on the back of higher sales vo ...
Thursday, 25 June 09
INDIA'S ULTRATECH BUYS 500,000T S.AFRICA COAL
Indian cement maker Ultratech has bought 10 handymax cargoes of South African coal at $73.00-$74.00 a tonne CIF for July-September delivery, Indian ...
Wednesday, 24 June 09
NTPC BURNS MORE COAL TO PRODUCE ELECTRICITY
A tonne of coal is the same as another tonne of coal, you might think.
But power major NTPC Ltd is finding that this year’s coal is not yie ...
Wednesday, 24 June 09
NTPC, COAL INDIA TO BUY MINING ASSETS OVERSEAS
State-owned utility National Thermal Power Corporation (NTPC) and the largest coal producer Coal India are in advanced stages of acquiring mining as ...
Tuesday, 23 June 09
NEWCASTLE WEEKLY COAL EXPORTS DECREASE 15%; SHIP QUEUE RISES
Coal shipments from Australia’s Newcastle port, the world’s biggest export harbor for the fuel, fell 15 percent last week while the numb ...
|
|
|
Showing 6651 to 6655 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Planning Commission, India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
|
| |
| |
|
