We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 01 July 09
NEWCASTLE WEEKLY COAL EXPORTS RISE BY 12PCT
Bloomberg reported that Coal shipments from Australia’s Newcastle port, the world’s biggest export harbor for the fuel, gained 12% last ...
Wednesday, 01 July 09
RS 6,000CR MMTC COAL IMPORT PLAN UNDER CLOUD
The plan of MMTC Ltd, a trading firm under the commerce ministry, to import coal worth Rs 6,000 crore has come under cloud, with the Central ...
Wednesday, 01 July 09
INDONESIAN FIRM BIDS FOR 130,000T COAL FOR NAPOCOR
Top Philippine electricity producer National Power Corp. (Napocor) said on Wednesday it received two bids from Indonesia's PT Trubaindo and its loc ...
Wednesday, 01 July 09
COAL PRICE INDEX TO BE LAUNCHED IN JULY
India will soon get a coal index to track the coal price movement in the country.
India's leading e-commerce company Mjunction Services Ltd will ...
Wednesday, 01 July 09
COAL INDIA SEEKS FASTER APPROVALS, IMPORTS, OVERSEAS MINERS
Coal India Ltd., the world’s biggest coal producer, wants mining approvals sped up to help it boost production to meet a widening supply short ...
|
|
|
Showing 6636 to 6640 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- The University of Queensland
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- White Energy Company Limited
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- MS Steel International - UAE
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Australian Coal Association
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
|
| |
| |
|
