We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 22 July 09
TAIPOWER RECEIVES 37 OFFERS IN TENDERS
State utility Taiwan Power has received offers for 37 panamax cargoes of bituminous and sub-bituminous coal in two tenders involving 12 panamax ship ...
Wednesday, 22 July 09
PRIME MINISTER APPROVAL SOUGHT TO HIKE COAL PRICES IN INDIA
PTI reported that decrying the low prices of the industrial fuel, the coal ministry will approach Dr Manmohan Singh PM of India next month for raisi ...
Tuesday, 21 July 09
BHATIA SAYS GETS ORDER FOR 800,000T COAL FROM KPCL
Reuters reported that, Indian traders Bhatia received on Tuesday a purchase order for 800,000 tonnes thermal coal at $63.00 C&F from Karnataka P ...
Tuesday, 21 July 09
NZ'S PIKE RIVER SAYS SELLS COAL AT $128 PER TONNE
Reuters reported that, New Zealand miner Pike River Coal said on Tuesday it had sold its premium hard coking coal at $128 a tonne for the curr ...
Tuesday, 21 July 09
NEWCASTLE COAL EXPORTS FALL 5%, SHIP QUEUE INCREASES
Bloomberg reported that, Coal shipments from Australia’s Newcastle port, the world’s biggest export harbor for the fuel, fell 5 per ...
|
|
|
Showing 6576 to 6580 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- PTC India Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Parliament of New Zealand
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Planning Commission, India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Australian Coal Association
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
