We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 23 July 09
COAL IMPORTS SURGE; EXPORTS DOWN IN H1
China Trade Information reported that, China’s coal imports surged by 126.3 percent year-on-year in the first half of 2009, reaching 48.3 mill ...
Thursday, 23 July 09
SRI LANKA CALLS FOR COAL SUPPLY BIDS
Daily Mirro reported that, In a move to install the country’s first coal power plant, Sri Lanka has invited bids to supply 2.4 million metric ...
Thursday, 23 July 09
POWER INVESTORS TURN BACKS ON VIETNAMESE COAL IMPORTERS
VietNamNet Bridge reported that, Investors of power plants always seek foreign coal sources to import themselves, believing they can come by it chea ...
Wednesday, 22 July 09
BERAU COAL DRAWS LOCAL, CHINESE BIDS - SOURCES
* Indonesian coal firm draws local, Chinese bids-sources
* Deal could value Berau at more than $1 billion-sources
Reuters reported that, China' ...
Wednesday, 22 July 09
ONE TENDERS FOR 114,000 MT FOR NOV-JAN
Moroccan state-owned power utility Office National de l’Electricité (ONE) has launched a tender for three handymax shipments of coal fo ...
|
|
|
Showing 6571 to 6575 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- White Energy Company Limited
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- The University of Queensland
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
