We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 24 July 09
INDIA TAKES 9 MILLION TONNES S. AFRICAN COAL JAN - JUNE
Reuters reported that, India accounted for nearly 9 million tonnes of South Africa's January-June exports of around 28 million tonnes, industry sour ...
Thursday, 23 July 09
KOMIPO LAUNCHES TWO COAL TENDERS
Korea Midland Power on Wednesday launched two tenders to procure bituminous or semi-anthracite coal for August to September delivery. Bids close on J ...
Thursday, 23 July 09
GUANGDONG BUYERS SET TO IMPORT 2.3 MILLION MT FROM VIETNAM - MEDIA
Several coal-consuming companies in China’s Guangdong Province, headed by Guangdong Yudean Group (Guangdong Power Generation Group), have inke ...
Thursday, 23 July 09
KEPCO BUYS 1.5% STAKE IN ADARO ENERGY FOR US$ 56.5M
WSJ reported that, state-run utility Korea Electric Power Corp., or Kepco, Thursday said it has acquired a 1.5% stake in Indonesian coal miner, PT A ...
Thursday, 23 July 09
INDONESIA COAL-PRICES CLIMB TO $80, INDIAN DEMAND SLOWS
Reuters reported that, prices of power-station coal in Australia, a benchmark for Asia, jumped to nearly $80 a tonne this week, while Indonesi ...
|
|
|
Showing 6566 to 6570 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- PTC India Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Planning Commission, India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
|
| |
| |
|
