We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 09 September 09
CHINESE INTEREST IN AUSTRALIA COAL TICKS UP AS PRICES FALL
After a lull of about two months, Australian thermal coal producers are now seeing renewed interest from Chinese buyers for spot cargoes in the four ...
Wednesday, 09 September 09
SALES FORECAST UP ON BETTER DISTRIBUTION
The Jakarta Post reported that, State coal producer PT Tambang Batubara Bukit Asam (PT BA) expects coal sales to rise by 11 percent next year as it ...
Wednesday, 09 September 09
NTPC HIRES MACQUARIE TO ADVISE INDONESIA COAL MINE PURCHASE
Bloomberg reported that, NTPC Ltd., Asia’s biggest power utility by value, has hired Macquarie Group Ltd. to evaluate a proposed coal mine pur ...
Tuesday, 08 September 09
SOUTH AFRICAN COAL FALLS MOST IN 11 WEEKS ON EXCESSIVE PRICES
Bloomberg reported that, Prices for coal shipped from South Africa’s Richards Bay, site of the world’s largest export terminal for the f ...
Tuesday, 08 September 09
INDIA MAY HAVE A JOINT WORKING GROUP FOR COAL WITH INDONESIA: SRIPRAKASH JAISWAL - PRESS RELEASE
Press Information Bureau of India reported in its web site that, The Coal Ministry has, in principle, agreed to set up a Joint Working Group for coa ...
|
|
|
Showing 6436 to 6440 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- The University of Queensland
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Planning Commission, India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- White Energy Company Limited
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|