We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 14 September 09
BOOM FORECAST FOR COAL OUTPUT
SMH.com reported that, A COAL investment boom is driving Australian production to new peaks even as our biggest export markets shift towards cleaner ...
Sunday, 13 September 09
COAL INDIA MAY ACQUIRE ASSETS OF RIO TINTO
Coal India’s plan to acquire overseas mining assets is gathering steam. After a breakthrough in Mozambique, the coal behemoth has received&nbs ...
Saturday, 12 September 09
THE INDIA / FAR EAST SEEMS WILL CONTINUE TO BE SOFT UNTIL THE IRON ORE MOVEMENTS PICKS UP - CAPT. REDDY
COALspot.com (Singapore): The dry bulk market continued to be stable at almost as same levels as last week and the BDI was at 2,468 points.
...
Saturday, 12 September 09
GOVT REQUESTS MORE TIME TO ACQUIRE 21% SHARES IN NNT
The Jakarta Post reported that, the government plans to request a postponement for the acquisition of 21 percent shares in PT Newmont Nusa Tenggara ...
Saturday, 12 September 09
INDONESIAN CO KEEN ON TRADING COAL FOR EQUITY IN POWER PROJECTS
Though most large power project promoters have their own mines in Indonesia, MEC is confident of convincing Indian companies as its price is quite a ...
|
|
|
Showing 6426 to 6430 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Australian Coal Association
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
|
| |
| |
|
