We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 07 September 09
VALE SPENT $300 MILLION AT MOZAMBIQUE COAL MINE
Bloomberg rported that, Vale SA, the world’s biggest iron- ore producer, has so far spent about $300 million of the $1.3 billion investment in ...
Monday, 07 September 09
INDIA MAY BOOST COAL IMPORTS FROM INDONESIA - PLAN JVS
WSJ reported taht, India agreed to study setting up joint ventures with Indonesian companies to acquire coal assets, and look at other means of impo ...
Monday, 07 September 09
INDIAN COAL MAY NOT POWER NEW UMPPS
The Economic Times reported that, bidders for new ultra mega power projects (UMPP) may not get assured coal supplies from domestic mines. As per the ...
Saturday, 05 September 09
THE ECI / CHINA (S7) ROUTE SOFTENED BY ALMOST 12% AND THE CHARTER HIRE WAS AT US$ 16,346 PER DAY - VISTAAR
COALspot.com (Singapore): The dry bulk market continued to be stable with the BDI almost same as last week at 2,415 points.The Panamax index went up b ...
Saturday, 05 September 09
SHANXI AIMS TO MAINTAIN 2009 COAL OUTPUT AT LAST YEAR'S LEVEL
Interfax-China reported that, Shanxi Province, the country's second-largest coal producing region, is aiming to keep its annual coal output a ...
|
|
|
Showing 6446 to 6450 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- VISA Power Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- White Energy Company Limited
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- MS Steel International - UAE
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
|
| |
| |
|