We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 23 September 09
TATA POWER TO COMMISSION 2 UNITS OF MUNDRA UMPP BY FEB 2012
Business Standard reported that, the country's largest private power producer Tata Power today said it would commission 1,600 MW capacity of its 4, ...
Wednesday, 23 September 09
NAVA BHARAT TO ADD 300MW CAPACITY, RAISE RS1,386 CRORE (US$ 289,674,610)
The firm plans to place orders for equipment by the end of October and commission both the plants by April 2012 to sell power in the open market
...
Tuesday, 22 September 09
ASIA COAL-PRICES TOPS $70 AS TRADERS SEEK BARGAINS
Reuters reported that, prices of power-station coal in Australia, a benchmark for Asia, rose for the second week to top $70 a tonne this week, clawi ...
Tuesday, 22 September 09
QINHUANGDAO COAL PRICES SURGE ON STRONG DEMAND
People's Daily Online reported that, Coal prices at Qinhuangdao port, China's largest coal port, witnessed the sharpest increase in the year last ...
Tuesday, 22 September 09
SHORT PERIOD RATE FOR SUPRAMAX WAS AROUND US$ 17,000 PER DAY FOR VESSELS OPENING FAR EAST / SE ASIA - VISTAAR
COALspot.com (Singapore): The dry bulk market continued to be stable with the BDI just dropping by about 5 pct to 2,356 points last week. The change ...
|
|
|
Showing 6406 to 6410 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Economic Council, Georgia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
|
| |
| |
|
