We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 25 September 09
FREIGHT RATE CUTS MAKING SOUTH AFRICAN COAL MORE COMPETITIVE IN ASIAN MARKETS
Mining Weekly reported that, Coaltrans South Africa MD Gerard Strahan highlighted the country’s sudden increase in coal exports to southern Ch ...
Friday, 25 September 09
XSTRATA TO BUILD ITS OWN RAIL CAPACITY TO SHIP AUSTRALIAN COAL
Bloomberg reported that, Xstrata Plc, the world’s largest exporter of coal used by power stations, will establish its own rail haulage capacit ...
Thursday, 24 September 09
INDIA CEMENT CO'S TO AWARD 200,000T COAL TENDER
Reuters reported that, India's biggest cement maker ACC Cement Ltd and Gujarat Ambuja will award on Thursday Sept 25 a tender for 100,000 tonnes ea ...
Thursday, 24 September 09
YUDEAN TO SIGN CO-OPERATION LETTER OF INTENT WITH RUSSIA COAL TRADE COMPANY
In the recent days, Gao Shiqiang, deputy manager of Yudean Group Co., Ltd. went and carried out the friendly talks with SUEK and inked the trade co- ...
Thursday, 24 September 09
ANGLO EYES DOUBLED METALLURGICAL COAL OUTPUT BY 2018
Mining group Anglo American could double its production of coal used for steel making by 2018 if all of its unapproved projects went ahead, the comp ...
|
|
|
Showing 6396 to 6400 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Planning Commission, India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Parliament of New Zealand
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Economic Council, Georgia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
