We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 22 September 09
AUSTRALIA SEES HIGHER ASIAN THERMAL COAL IMPORTS
* Asia '09 imports to rise 3.5%, vs pvs f'cast of 3.3% fall
* Asia 2010 thermal coal imports expected to rise 6.3 pct
* China to become net im ...
Tuesday, 22 September 09
PANAMA CANAL EXPANSION MAY AID COLOMBIA COAL TO ASIA
* Colombia producers hope for growth in Asia shipments
* Panama Canal will allow smaller coal Capesize vessels
* Australia, Indonesia to remain bi ...
Monday, 21 September 09
ACCC SET TO APPROVE NEWCASTLE COAL SHIPPING AGREEMENT
ABC reported that, The competition regulator says it is likely to approve a new agreement over coal loading arrangements at Newcastle.
Australian ...
Friday, 18 September 09
PEABODY ENERGY ESTABLISHES ASIAN COAL TRADING HUB IN SINGAPORE
Peabody Energy announced it has opened an office in Singapore that will serve as the new hub for Peabody COALTRADE International activities in South ...
Friday, 18 September 09
AUSTRALIA NEWCASTLE COAL PORT: SEEKS INTERIM QUOTA SYSTEM
Reuters reported that, Australia's Newcastle coal terminal wants to re-introduce an interim export quota system after a group of miners led by BHP ...
|
|
|
Showing 6411 to 6415 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- PTC India Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Planning Commission, India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Australian Coal Association
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
|
| |
| |
|
