We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 30 September 09
COKING COAL PRICES MAY TOUCH $200/TN IN 2010-11
Business Standard reported that, Driven by surge in imports of coking coal by China, growth in Japanese steel output and signs of recovery in the In ...
Wednesday, 30 September 09
PURNOMO BIDS 'GOODBYE' TO ENERGY MINISTRY
The Jakarta globe reported that, In what could be construed as a resignation speech from a government official — but perhaps wasn’t &mda ...
Tuesday, 29 September 09
MINING AND ENERGY DAY 2009
The Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources, Purnomo Yusgiantoro led the ceremony marking 2009 Mining and Energy Day celebrations, held at the Depa ...
Tuesday, 29 September 09
BUKIT ASAM REDUCES ITS SALES TARGET
Tempo Interactive reported that, PT Tambang Batubara Bukit Asam Tbk has decided to reduce its sales target this year from 14.5 million tons of coal ...
Monday, 28 September 09
INDONESIA UNLIKELY TO PASS NEW MINING RULES IN 2009
Reuters reported that, Indonesia is unlikely to complete final regulations attached to a new mining and coal law this year, an official said on Mond ...
|
|
|
Showing 6386 to 6390 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- PTC India Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- The University of Queensland
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Australian Coal Association
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
|
| |
| |
|
