We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 04 October 09
GOVT THREATENS TO CANCEL COAL BLOCK ALLOTTED TO BINANI CEMENT
Economic Times reported that, The government has threatened to cancel a coal block allocated for captive use to Binani Cement saying the company see ...
Saturday, 03 October 09
SHORT PERIOD RATES FOR SUPRAMAX WAS AROUND US$ 17,000 PER DAY FOR VESSELS OPENING FAR EAST / SE ASIA - VISTAAR
COALspot.com (Singapore): The BDI firmed up this week by almost 8 pct to 2,357 points , the main reason being jump in Cape size index by almost 22 p ...
Friday, 02 October 09
C&O SEES INDONESIA COAL PURCHASES UP 20 PCT IN 2010
Reuters reported that, Dubai-based coal trader Coal & Oil (C&0) expects its coal purchases from Indonesia to increase by at least 20 percent ...
Thursday, 01 October 09
MJUNCTION LAUNCHES INDIA'S FIRST COAL SPOT PRICE INDEX
• Named 'MJcomposite, MJsteel, MJcement, MJpower' the value weighted index will benefit Indian coal buyers by minimising risk against pr ...
Wednesday, 30 September 09
INDIA CEMENTS SET TO PRODUCE POWER; EYES COAL MINE IN INDONESIA
Financial Express reported that, Tamil Nadu-based India Cements Ltd (ICL) has firmed up plans to produce power to meet its current and future requir ...
|
|
|
Showing 6381 to 6385 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Australian Coal Association
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- The University of Queensland
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- PTC India Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
|
| |
| |
|