We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 07 October 09
WORLD'S LEADING COAL-BASED PP PROJECT TO BEGIN TRIAL PRODUCTION NEXT YEAR IN NW CHINA
Xinhua Net reported that, a coal-based polypropylene (PP) production project in northwest China, believed to be the world's largest one, is to ...
Wednesday, 07 October 09
INDIA SAIL TO IMPORT 10-11 MLN T COAL IN FY10 - EXEC
Reuters reported that, Steel Authority of India Ltd plans to import 10-11 million tonnes of coal in the current year to March, below last year's 13 ...
Wednesday, 07 October 09
DOMESTIC SHIPPING FIRMS READY FOR NEW RULES ON COAL, INDUSTRY GROUP SAYS
The Jakarta Globe reported that, The domestic coal-shipping sector is ready for the introduction of shipping regulations requiring all power station ...
Wednesday, 07 October 09
CHINESE BANK MAY PULL OUT OF SUMATRA COAL RAILWAY
The Jakarta Globe reported that, The Export-Import Bank of China may pull out of a $1.28 billion South Sumatra coal-railway project with state-owned ...
Wednesday, 07 October 09
COAL INDIA LOOKS AT LONG-TERM PRICE CONTRACTS
Economic Times reported that, Coal India is looking at long-term price contracts, of at least three-four year periods, with foreign entities, 54 of ...
|
|
|
Showing 6366 to 6370 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Parliament of New Zealand
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- PTC India Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Australian Coal Association
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
|
| |
| |
|
